#ΜΕΣΗ ΑΝΑΤΟΛΗ#ΤΙΜΕΣ-ΣΤΟΧΟΙ ΜΕΤΟΧΩΝ#ΕΞΑΓΟΡΕΣ-ΣΥΓΧΩΝΕΥΣΕΙΣ#ΟΥΚΡΑΝΙΑ#ΜΕΤΑΚΙΝΗΣΗ ΣΤΕΛΕΧΩΝ#ΔΑΣΜΟΙ#ΥΠΟΚΛΟΠΕΣ#ΠΛΗΘΩΡΙΣΜΟΣ-ΑΚΡΙΒΕΙΑ
Δείτε εδώ την ειδική έκδοση

Lambasting lawyers

Δημοσιεύθηκε: 26 Μαρτίου 2008 - 01:50

Blame the lawyers. At least, that is what some did in explaining why JPMorgan had to raise its offer for Bear Stearns five-fold, citing supposedly lax wording in the merger agreement. Never mind that JPMorgan's guarantee of Bear's trades seemed clear enough when it was announced and had to be relatively unencumbered anyway in order to achieve a key objective – ie, keeping counterparties trading with Bear. Even if the theory does not stand up, this is not the only mooted deal of recent vintage where quarrels have arisen over the wording of contracts. In December, a court upheld Cerberus Capital Management's right to walk away from a $6.6bn buy-out of United Rentals in return for paying a $100m reverse break-up fee. The argument there centred on the interpretation of two provisions in the merger agreement. In January, Sallie Mae settled rather than try to force prospective buyers to proceed with a deal after the latter invoked a material adverse change clause. It is too simplistic to blame sloppy drafting for disputes. Still, there may be room for improvement in terms of updating the often-archaic language used in merger agreements, as firms such as Jones Day and contract specialist Kenneth Adams have called for. This would help in ensuring deal contracts make clearer the position of each party to a deal. It is more likely that rapidly changing circumstances have fuelled disputes. The rapid-fire deal environment of recent years may have created an impression that there was only a low risk of merger provisions being tested to destruction. Why kick up a fuss over some ambiguous wording when the deal seems certain to happen anyway? Few negotiators could have guessed that credit markets would deteriorate so sharply that buyers would choose to risk reputations by walking away. On this front, a cooling merger market should do its bit in prompting greater clarity. Post and read comments on this Lex
© The Financial Times Limited 2008. All rights reserved.
FT and Financial Times are trademarks of the Financial Times Ltd.
Not to be redistributed, copied or modified in any way.
Euro2day.gr is solely responsible for providing this translation and the Financial Times Limited does not accept any liability for the accuracy or quality of the translation

ΣΧΕΤΙΚΑ ΘΕΜΑΤΑ

Ερχεται νέο ιστορικό ρεκόρ στις αιτήσεις συνταξιοδότησης

ΥΠΕΝ: Φωτιές άναψε η παραίτηση Μπακογιάννη - Tο κύκλωμα και οι εκκρεμότητες

Τράπεζες και ΔΕΗ ανεβάζουν το Χρηματιστήριο

Νέα «μάχη» για τον νόμο Κατσέλη: Τόκους από το… παράθυρο φέρνουν οι servicers

ΣΧΟΛΙΑ ΧΡΗΣΤΩΝ

blog comments powered by Disqus
Αρχή

Διεθνείς αποκλειστικές συνεργασίες:

Οι τιμές των μετοχών και των δεικτών εμφανίζονται με καθυστέρηση 15’. Οι τιμές των μετοχών και των ελληνικών δεικτών προέρχονται από την InBroker

Το σύνολο του περιεχομένου και των υπηρεσιών του euro2day διατίθεται στους επισκέπτες για προσωπική χρήση. Απαγορεύεται η χρήση και η επαναδημοσίευσή του χωρίς τη γραπτή άδεια του εκδότη.

Δήλωση Απορρήτου και Προστασίας Δεδομένων Προσωπικού Χαρακτήρα
Copyright © 2001 – 2026 MEDIA2DAY All Rights Reserved. Managed Cloud by C2
v
Απόρρητο